On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 15:22, PeterKorman wrote: > There are 2 RFCs. > [....] > RFC1894 > is for MTAs. The UA generates only the request. The MTA generates the > response. Dr. QMail dismisses rfc1894 as entirely obsolete. DJBernstien > has his own method but, AFAIK, he didn't write an RFC, so chances of a > standard emerging from 'The QMail Way' are somehwat difficult to > prognosticate.
Frankly no one is much interested in RFC1894 - I think sendmail does at least partially implement it (which is a shame - it legitimises it), but the other mainstream mailers give it a wide berth. Here's a quote from the exim list:- http://www.exim.org/mailman/htdig/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-19990927/014475.html Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
