oh, I just remembered that NAi's Outlook plugin allows the user to enable PGP/MIME reading support (we tested this a few weeks ago with Outlkook Express). Unfortunately, with Outlook Express at least, we weren't able to send PGP/MIME - but maybe with Outlook you can? Dunno.
Jeff On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:16, Jason Frisvold wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:03, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:26, Jason Frisvold wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a > > > great product. I have a problem I would like to solve, though. I use > > > GPG to sign my emails. I'd like to be able to sign them and have a user > > > with a windows machine and PGP be able to verify the signature. > > > However, PGP doesn't seem to be able to recognize the GPG signature. > > > > how so? > > Well, we use Microsoft Exchange as the Mail server and Outlook as the > client. Outlook sees the message itself, but the GPG signature arrives > as an attachment (signature.asc) ... > > I have been very unsuccessful in forcing it to not attach... I was > under the impression that the signature should be ascii... Any idea why > it's showing up as an attachment? > > > no, but what parameters would you call gpg with different from what we > > already do? > > Not sure yet .. was wondering so I could start playing with the > parameters in an effort to get this to work in an expected manner. > > > we don't tell gpg to use any gpg.conf file, but gpg does still check > > it's own config settings in ~/.gnupg/options if that is what you mean? > > Yes, that's basically what I mean ... Apparently GPG changed since > 1.0.7 (which is what RH8.0 ships with) and is supposed to now use a > gpg.conf file rather than options. Although, it still read options if > it's there... > > > not really, no. other than "Always trust" which sends the --always-trust > > option to gpg. > > *nod* > > > because gpg implements the Pretty Good Privacy specification. the name > > wasn't chosen by which executable it runs, but rather the specification > > it implements. > > Oh, ok ... :) Was just curious... You have a FAQ question explicitly > stating that Evolution no longer supports PGP, but still call it PGP > within the program ... Just a little confusing... I get the point of > it though... > > > Jeff > > Thanks for the info ... > > > -- > > --------------------------- > > Jason H. Frisvold > > Backbone Engineer > > Penteledata Engineering > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > RedHat Certified - RHCE # 807302349405893 > > --------------------------- > > "Something mysterious is formed, born in the silent void. Waiting alone > > and unmoving, it is at once still and yet in constant motion. It is the > > source of all programs. I do not know its name, so I will call it the > > Tao of Programming." -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
