just to get this thread to stop, since it's going no where... Ximian is considering implementing a bayesian spam filter within Evolution itself. Management is pushing for it to be implemented for Evolution 1.4 but I seriously doubt Michael and I will have the time to do it in so short an amount of time, but that doesn't mean it won't make it into the version *after* 1.4 (or a version shortly after?).
Jeff On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:10, Jim Frost wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:48, Arthur Britto wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:12, Jim Frost wrote: > > > I note that I looked into spamassassin, which seems to be the preferred > > > technique using an external filter, and I really dislike its rule-based > > > system. Way too many false positives, and a lot of work to set up and > > > maintain too. Spam filtering would be a great integrated feature and > > > doesn't look like it'd be a lot of work to implement. > > > > SpamAssassin + fetchmail + procmail + Evolution is great. > > This may be the case, although I reiterate that I don't like > spamassassin because it doesn't do as good a job as statistical filters > and takes a lot more work to tune. Still, setting up something like > this is not straightforward and has no advantages over having an > integrated filter. > > I mean, I have to learn how to set up and maintain not one software > package but four. It's nice that you all have the time to screw around > with all that stuff, but I have an actual job I have to do. > > jim > > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
