On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 18:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 06:35:12PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > maybe that error isn't sent in a packet? I'm not exactly sure what the > > error means, but I would have suspected an error in the certificate or > > in the validation of the certificate, not an error packet from the > > server. > > > > The "Bad Record MAC" error - quoting openssl.org - "This alert is > returned if a record is received with an incorrect MAC. This message is > always fatal." > > I'll look a little closer to try and see if the alert message states 'which' > record had the bad MAC. > > > > > > > How can you be so sure that it's not a bug in Evolution (or did I just take > > > the bait)? > > > > because evolution doesn't implement SSL and it sure as hell isn't > > capable of producing a "Bad Record MAC" error string? :-) > > Ah huh! Good point. >;-> But there have been bugs where Evolution wasn't calling > the correct function of an SSL API or passing incorrect information.
that would be news to me... > > > > > this is why I say maybe it's a bug in mozilla's nss ssl library. > > > > So Evolution uses nss ssl and not openssl? Does anyone know another app that > the same SSL library that Evolution uses whatever it is? yep, we don't use openssl. we use mozilla's nss instead. you could maybe try mozilla mail? I dunno. Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
