On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 14:10, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > what message was the reply to? maybe you can try reproducing the > problem? and/or maybe I can take a look to see if anything stands out > that may have caused the problem? > > Jeff > > On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:11, Bill Hartwell wrote: > > Now the question comes of...how did Evolution queue a message with no > > recipients? For that matter, how did it lose the recipients when it was > > nothing more than a reply to a message on the list, which should have > > automatically brought the addresses over from the message it was a reply > > to?
The subject was "Built-in spam filtering?" and the message number was [EMAIL PROTECTED] I figure if you still have it in your message folders and can pull it up, it'll save a little bandwidth - and reduce the risk of something getting changed in transit. A possible solution that comes to my mind is that maybe the address got garbled or lost if it was one of those I trimmed down by deleting the ccs and copying the address I wanted to send it to from the Cc: field to the To: field. Since I have the mailing lists in my address book, they don't show up as addresses in the message editing display - instead, they show up with the IDs they have in my address book. Would cut/paste from one field to another break the link to the address book so that the ID is dereferenced? -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
