tor, 2003-01-09 kl. 17:55 skrev Chris Toshok: > mailGroup and the lachman/laser stuff seem more geared toward mail > delivery, letting you specify which mailHost to use for a particular > address, which addresses are local, etc.
O.k. but not the Lachmann-Laser draft I have. That only covers formatting of mail objectClasses. And IMHO choosing what mail server to use is like buttering pork fat to make it more fatty (Norwegian expression: "sm�r p� flesk"). Waste of time and energy. > There's another draft, from which rfc822MailMember seems to originate > (expired 1999): > > http://www.globecom.net/ietf/draft/draft-srivastava-ldap-mail-00.html Openldap.org just uses it. > Yeah, nisMailAlias is another alternative, but for some reason (I don't > really understand it myself, possibly because of my tour as a sysadmin) > I find myself wanting to steer clear of anything with "NIS" in its name > :) That's really the reason I replied to this one - I had to laugh. My experience is exactly the same - nasty taste in the mouth for ever and ever. However, think of NIS as being nsswitch.conf, in which you can ban NIS for ever. It's only a name, like the bogey man. > Well the only thing we really need to decide upon is the attribute > that'll be used to hold raw email addresses, since that basically > dictates what structural classes we'll be able to interoperate with. > Whatever objectclass mozilla/evolution ends up using should be auxiliary > - We'll need another objectClass anyway to store mua specific things, > like "hide the email addresses when i send email to this list", Hadn't thought of that. I just did a test, sent to unqualified localmailgroup out of Evo 1.2.1 and read the headers of what I received: __________________________________________________________________ Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:12:26 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by billy.demon.nl with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.12) id 18Wh9b-0003li-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:11:43 +0100 Subject: Test 1 From: Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1042135901.13231.83.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Date: 09 Jan 2003 19:11:42 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Evolution-Source: imap://tonye@localhost/ Test 1 ____________________________________________________________________ Maybe if it had been sent seriously, the headers would have been different. So I sent it to a member at an Internet address: _____________________________________________________________________ Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:17:22 +0100 Received: from punt-15.mail.nl.demon.net ([194.159.73.24]) by billy.demon.nl with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 18WiB1-0003vn-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:17:15 +0100 Received: from punt-17.mail.nl.demon.net by mailstore for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1042139048:17:05054:10; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:04:08 GMT Received: from relay-12.mail.nl.demon.net ([194.159.73.28]) by punt-17.mail.nl.demon.net id aa1705065; 9 Jan 2003 19:04 GMT Received: from [158.36.191.136] (helo=developer.skolelinux.no) by relay-12.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 18WhyI-000Jpy-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:04:06 +0000 Received: by developer.skolelinux.no (Postfix) id EFF522D6E1; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:04:06 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from billy.demon.nl (billy.demon.nl [212.238.97.135]) by developer.skolelinux.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D215E2D6DF for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:03:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by billy.demon.nl with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.12) id 18Whxe-0003oq-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:03:26 +0100 Subject: Test 1 From: Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1042139004.13239.139.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Date: 09 Jan 2003 20:03:25 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Evolution-Source: imap://tonye@localhost/ Test 1 ________________________________________________________________________ It doesn't show the individual addresses, so you should be able to forget that one. Or perhaps that's MTA dependant? Everybody should use Exim? > MS likes to store filters in their active directory stuff (at least I've > seen a few in my dealings with it), so it wouldn't suprise me if they > support something like membershipFilter (from the srivastava draft).. > And that might be a good feature to add to evolution, but I'm loathe to > fire off nested queries to fully resolve an object (which is the reason > I hate groupOf{Unique}Names). Me too. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw When all's said and done ... there's nothing left to say or do. e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.billy.demon.nl _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
