On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:40, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 14:42, Not Zed wrote:
>
> > > In-Reply-To: Message from Bob Apthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> of "Mon, 13
>Jan 2003 15:36:24 CST."
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > I've asked the author of the offending message what mailer he used, I'll
> > > report back when I get an answer.
> >
> > Its not that easy, we take the first <> part of in-reply-to, which is
> > normally the right thing, but with some mailers it isn't. It isn't
> > possible to tell from code ...
>
> do {
> if nth <...> part does match an existing Message-Id
> put it in this messages thread
> while (no more <...> parts in header);
this isn't a feasable solution for multiple reasons.
Jeff
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
