Tziporet Koren wrote:
OFED October 8 meeting summary on OFED 1.3 alpha readiness
Meeting summary:
============
1. Alpha release is planed for this week (Wed or Thursday)
2. Requests for the beta release
Hi Tziporet,
As of the centrality and importance of IPoIB, my take is that at this
point the correct thing to do would be to remove the stateless offload
patches et al that for the most part did not pass any review on the
general list.
I am talking on the LSO patches, the checksum patches whose related
discussion has started but never ended. The LRO patch is problematic and
need to be fixed as Eli has agreed. Its also pure SW optimization and I
don't see why rush to merge it into OFED 1.3.
As for the interrupt mitigation patches, I have sent some comments and
Eli only replied on some of them, nothing was changed or fixed yet, and
other then this, no review has been done.
This is just my opinion, can be nice to see what others have to say.
I am referring to these patches under kernel_patches/fixes
t_0010_ipoib_high_dma.patch
t_0017_ipoib_sg.patch
t_0019_hw_csum.patch
t_0020_core_csum.patch
t_0030_mthca_checksum_offload.patch
t_0040_mlx4_checksum_offload.patch
t_0050_ipoib_checksum_offload.patch
t_0060_ipoib_qp_init_attr.patch
t_0080_mlx4_qp_max_msg.patch
t_0090_core_lso.patch
t_0100_mlx4_lso.patch
t_0110_ipoib_lso.patch
t_0120_ipoib_ethtool.patch
t_0130_ipoib_lro.patch
t_0140_core_modify_cq.patch
t_0150_mlx4_modify_cq.patch
t_0160_ipoib_modify_cq.patch
t_0170_cq_coal.patch
Or.
_______________________________________________
ewg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
