> > I guess you mean just implement XRC without allowing multiple > > processes to share an XRC domain? That actually seems like a sensible > > thing to implement as well... > > This is part of the current XRC implementation -- just give -1 as the fd > value > in ibv_open_xrc_domain().
I *think* Gleb's point was that the XRC implementation could be much simpler if this were the *only* case supported -- you wouldn't need all the complexity of kernel receive QPs etc I guess. Gleb, is that what you meant? _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
