>> With the addition of getnam(), sin_port is filled in with >>the reserved port number and cma_any_port will evaluate to >>false and the reserved port will get used instead.
>So the only problem was carving a port from the proprietary ports pool >of the rdma-cm where a port was already allocated from the >network stack? Another way to look at it is, we want rdma cm to use the port reserved by the allocated socket. V3 addressed an issue with port 0 causing rdma cm to not use the reserved port. Chien_______________________________________________ ewg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
