Our "suppress DMEM" code works in these kernels only if
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SPARSE_MEMORY is disabled, so patch it out again.
Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Vlad, please apply this one for RC5 -- thanks!
Joachim
diff -Nurp a/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.24/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
b/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.24/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
--- a/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.24/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ b/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.24/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
2008-11-14 15:39:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+From 263c24a2bbbaca75805ed231e8346d86410af9d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:54:38 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Reject dynamic memory add/remove when ehca adapter
is present
+
+Since the ehca device driver does not support dynamic memory add and
+remove operations, the driver must explicitly reject such requests in
+order to prevent unpredictable behaviors related to existing memory
+regions that cover all of memory being used by InfiniBand protocols in
+the kernel.
+
+The solution (for now at least) is to add a memory notifier to the
+ehca device driver and if a request for dynamic memory add or remove
+comes in, ehca will always reject it. The user can add or remove
+memory by hot-removing the ehca adapter, performing the memory
+operation, and then hot-adding the ehca adapter back.
+
+Signed-off-by: Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+---
+ drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c | 48 --------------------------------
+ 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
+index bb02a86..086959a 100644
+--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
++++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
+@@ -44,8 +44,6 @@
+ #include <linux/slab.h>
+ #endif
+
+-#include <linux/notifier.h>
+-#include <linux/memory.h>
+ #include "ehca_classes.h"
+ #include "ehca_iverbs.h"
+ #include "ehca_mrmw.h"
+@@ -971,41 +969,6 @@ void ehca_poll_eqs(unsigned long data)
+ spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+ }
+
+-static int ehca_mem_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+- unsigned long action, void *data)
+-{
+- static unsigned long ehca_dmem_warn_time;
+-
+- switch (action) {
+- case MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE:
+- case MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE:
+- case MEM_ONLINE:
+- case MEM_OFFLINE:
+- return NOTIFY_OK;
+- case MEM_GOING_ONLINE:
+- case MEM_GOING_OFFLINE:
+- /* only ok if no hca is attached to the lpar */
+- spin_lock(&shca_list_lock);
+- if (list_empty(&shca_list)) {
+- spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+- return NOTIFY_OK;
+- } else {
+- spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+- if (printk_timed_ratelimit(&ehca_dmem_warn_time,
+- 30 * 1000))
+- ehca_gen_err("DMEM operations are not allowed"
+- "as long as an ehca adapter is"
+- "attached to the LPAR");
+- return NOTIFY_BAD;
+- }
+- }
+- return NOTIFY_OK;
+-}
+-
+-static struct notifier_block ehca_mem_nb = {
+- .notifier_call = ehca_mem_notifier,
+-};
+-
+ static int __init ehca_module_init(void)
+ {
+ int ret;
+@@ -1033,12 +996,6 @@ static int __init ehca_module_init(void)
+ goto module_init2;
+ }
+
+- ret = register_memory_notifier(&ehca_mem_nb);
+- if (ret) {
+- ehca_gen_err("Failed registering memory add/remove notifier");
+- goto module_init3;
+- }
+-
+ if (ehca_poll_all_eqs != 1) {
+ ehca_gen_err("WARNING!!!");
+ ehca_gen_err("It is possible to lose interrupts.");
+@@ -1051,9 +1008,6 @@ static int __init ehca_module_init(void)
+
+ return 0;
+
+-module_init3:
+- ibmebus_unregister_driver(&ehca_driver);
+-
+ module_init2:
+ ehca_destroy_slab_caches();
+
+@@ -1069,8 +1023,6 @@ static void __exit ehca_module_exit(void)
+
+ ibmebus_unregister_driver(&ehca_driver);
+
+- unregister_memory_notifier(&ehca_mem_nb);
+-
+ ehca_destroy_slab_caches();
+
+ ehca_destroy_comp_pool();
+--
+1.5.5
+
diff -Nurp a/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.25/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
b/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.25/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
--- a/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.25/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ b/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.25/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
2008-11-14 15:39:01.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+From 263c24a2bbbaca75805ed231e8346d86410af9d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:54:38 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Reject dynamic memory add/remove when ehca adapter
is present
+
+Since the ehca device driver does not support dynamic memory add and
+remove operations, the driver must explicitly reject such requests in
+order to prevent unpredictable behaviors related to existing memory
+regions that cover all of memory being used by InfiniBand protocols in
+the kernel.
+
+The solution (for now at least) is to add a memory notifier to the
+ehca device driver and if a request for dynamic memory add or remove
+comes in, ehca will always reject it. The user can add or remove
+memory by hot-removing the ehca adapter, performing the memory
+operation, and then hot-adding the ehca adapter back.
+
+Signed-off-by: Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+---
+ drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c | 48 --------------------------------
+ 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
+index bb02a86..086959a 100644
+--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
++++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
+@@ -44,8 +44,6 @@
+ #include <linux/slab.h>
+ #endif
+
+-#include <linux/notifier.h>
+-#include <linux/memory.h>
+ #include "ehca_classes.h"
+ #include "ehca_iverbs.h"
+ #include "ehca_mrmw.h"
+@@ -971,41 +969,6 @@ void ehca_poll_eqs(unsigned long data)
+ spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+ }
+
+-static int ehca_mem_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+- unsigned long action, void *data)
+-{
+- static unsigned long ehca_dmem_warn_time;
+-
+- switch (action) {
+- case MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE:
+- case MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE:
+- case MEM_ONLINE:
+- case MEM_OFFLINE:
+- return NOTIFY_OK;
+- case MEM_GOING_ONLINE:
+- case MEM_GOING_OFFLINE:
+- /* only ok if no hca is attached to the lpar */
+- spin_lock(&shca_list_lock);
+- if (list_empty(&shca_list)) {
+- spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+- return NOTIFY_OK;
+- } else {
+- spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+- if (printk_timed_ratelimit(&ehca_dmem_warn_time,
+- 30 * 1000))
+- ehca_gen_err("DMEM operations are not allowed"
+- "as long as an ehca adapter is"
+- "attached to the LPAR");
+- return NOTIFY_BAD;
+- }
+- }
+- return NOTIFY_OK;
+-}
+-
+-static struct notifier_block ehca_mem_nb = {
+- .notifier_call = ehca_mem_notifier,
+-};
+-
+ static int __init ehca_module_init(void)
+ {
+ int ret;
+@@ -1033,12 +996,6 @@ static int __init ehca_module_init(void)
+ goto module_init2;
+ }
+
+- ret = register_memory_notifier(&ehca_mem_nb);
+- if (ret) {
+- ehca_gen_err("Failed registering memory add/remove notifier");
+- goto module_init3;
+- }
+-
+ if (ehca_poll_all_eqs != 1) {
+ ehca_gen_err("WARNING!!!");
+ ehca_gen_err("It is possible to lose interrupts.");
+@@ -1051,9 +1008,6 @@ static int __init ehca_module_init(void)
+
+ return 0;
+
+-module_init3:
+- ibmebus_unregister_driver(&ehca_driver);Hi, Vlad,
please pull from ~hnguyen/libehca.git -- there's a new fix for OFED 1.4 in
there.
Thanks and regards,
Joachim
+-
+ module_init2:
+ ehca_destroy_slab_caches();
+
+@@ -1069,8 +1023,6 @@ static void __exit ehca_module_exit(void)
+
+ ibmebus_unregister_driver(&ehca_driver);
+
+- unregister_memory_notifier(&ehca_mem_nb);
+-
+ ehca_destroy_slab_caches();
+
+ ehca_destroy_comp_pool();
+--
+1.5.5
+
diff -Nurp a/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.26/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
b/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.26/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
--- a/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.26/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ b/kernel_patches/backport/2.6.26/ehca_00_revert_inhibit_dmem.patch
2008-11-14 15:39:02.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+From 263c24a2bbbaca75805ed231e8346d86410af9d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:54:38 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Reject dynamic memory add/remove when ehca adapter
is present
+
+Since the ehca device driver does not support dynamic memory add and
+remove operations, the driver must explicitly reject such requests in
+order to prevent unpredictable behaviors related to existing memory
+regions that cover all of memory being used by InfiniBand protocols in
+the kernel.
+
+The solution (for now at least) is to add a memory notifier to the
+ehca device driver and if a request for dynamic memory add or remove
+comes in, ehca will always reject it. The user can add or removeHi, Vlad,
please pull from ~hnguyen/libehca.git -- there's a new fix for OFED 1.4 in
there.
Thanks and regards,
Joachim
+memory by hot-removing the ehca adapter, performing the memory
+operation, and then hot-adding the ehca adapter back.
+
+Signed-off-by: Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+---
+ drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c | 48 --------------------------------
+ 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
+index bb02a86..086959a 100644
+--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
++++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c
+@@ -44,8 +44,6 @@
+ #include <linux/slab.h>
+ #endif
+
+-#include <linux/notifier.h>
+-#include <linux/memory.h>
+ #include "ehca_classes.h"
+ #include "ehca_iverbs.h"
+ #include "ehca_mrmw.h"
+@@ -971,41 +969,6 @@ void ehca_poll_eqs(unsigned long data)
+ spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+ }
+
+-static int ehca_mem_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+- unsigned long action, void *data)
+-{
+- static unsigned long ehca_dmem_warn_time;
+-
+- switch (action) {
+- case MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE:Hi, Vlad,
please pull from ~hnguyen/libehca.git -- there's a new fix for OFED 1.4 in
there.
Thanks and regards,
Joachim
+- case MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE:
+- case MEM_ONLINE:
+- case MEM_OFFLINE:
+- return NOTIFY_OK;
+- case MEM_GOING_ONLINE:
+- case MEM_GOING_OFFLINE:
+- /* only ok if no hca is attached to the lpar */
+- spin_lock(&shca_list_lock);
+- if (list_empty(&shca_list)) {
+- spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+- return NOTIFY_OK;
+- } else {
+- spin_unlock(&shca_list_lock);
+- if (printk_timed_ratelimit(&ehca_dmem_warn_time,
+- 30 * 1000))
+- ehca_gen_err("DMEM operations are not allowed"
+- "as long as an ehca adapter is"
+- "attached to the LPAR");
+- return NOTIFY_BAD;
+- }
+- }
+- return NOTIFY_OK;
+-}
+-
+-static struct notifier_block ehca_mem_nb = {
+- .notifier_call = ehca_mem_notifier,
+-};
+-
+ static int __init ehca_module_init(void)
+ {
+ int ret;
+@@ -1033,12 +996,6 @@ static int __init ehca_module_init(void)
+ goto module_init2;
+ }
+
+- ret = register_memory_notifier(&ehca_mem_nb);
+- if (ret) {
+- ehca_gen_err("Failed registering memory add/remove notifier");
+- goto module_init3;
+- }
+-
+ if (ehca_poll_all_eqs != 1) {
+ ehca_gen_err("WARNING!!!");
+ ehca_gen_err("It is possible to lose interrupts.");
+@@ -1051,9 +1008,6 @@ static int __init ehca_module_init(void)
+
+ return 0;
+
+-module_init3:
+- ibmebus_unregister_driver(&ehca_driver);
+-
+ module_init2:
+ ehca_destroy_slab_caches();
+
+@@ -1069,8 +1023,6 @@ static void __exit ehca_module_exit(void)
+
+ ibmebus_unregister_driver(&ehca_driver);
+
+- unregister_memory_notifier(&ehca_mem_nb);
+-
+ ehca_destroy_slab_caches();
+
+ ehca_destroy_comp_pool();
+--
+1.5.5
+
_______________________________________________
ewg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
