On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:52:02AM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 09:27 -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > > > Maybe. I thought include_next included it after the existing file was > > processed. > > Hrm. You could be right about that. My interpretation was always that > it included it immediately, as if the contents of the #include_next > files were actually in the caller's file right where the #include_next > is.
#include_next behaves identically to #include except that the include search path order is altered. Brian is right, the included files contents are substituted immediately. Jason _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
