Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenst...@gmail.com> wrote on 01.07.2009 17:54:41:
> It does say that the LID might not be valid even though non-zero. Can you elaborate on that? I can't seem to find that in the spec. What I do find, though, is this: "If this value is non-zero, it is the DLID a requester _shall_ use to access the class services." -- v1.2, p736, line 7 Which sounds to me like: If it's non-zero, it's valid and you must use it. > I'm > thinking of the more general case (future) rather than just IBM eHCA > usage. I stopped thinking "eHCA only" two patches ago, don't worry ;) BTW, I'm going to be out of the office starting now and returning next Tuesday, so let's continue this discussion next week ;) Cheers, Joachim _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
