On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:11:21AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: Would like to fix a typo: I meant bellow: Saying that the patch set did not go through a review process would **be** inaccurate.
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:38:59AM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > > > yes, this would be simply not supportable, think about that, you want > > to hand your customers with a code which didn't pass review nor > > acceptance by the Linux IB stack maintainers (Roland and Sean), say, > > next a crash happens at this or that module / line, next, what you > > except the maintainers to do? > > > Saying that the patch set did not go through a review process would > not inaccurate. > Bellow is a brief log of major changes done on the RDMAoE patches for > your reference. A detailed correspondence can be found at the > openfabrics general list. > > Rev1 - June 15 2009, first patch set sent for review > Rev2 - June 25 2009, Sean - move path resolution to a new module > (rdmaoe_sa) > Rev3 - July 13 2009, Sean, Roland, share data structs between > multicast.c and rdmaoe_sa.c, distinguish between rdmaoe and ib calls > at the cma, increment ABI version > Rev4 - Aug 5 2009, Woody Sean Or, ports are differentiated by port > protocol rather than port type, move rdmaoe sa functionality to cma > Rev5 - Aug 19 2009, Roland, Sean, don't use broadcast MACs to map > multicast GIDs, MAD service disabled for userspace, add > rdma_is_transport_supported() > Annonuce - Sep 17 2009, OFED-RDMAoE branch announce, daily builds > available > Rev6 - Nov 16 2009, NIC programming moved from CMA to hw driver so > verbs consumer can utilize it. > > > _______________________________________________ > ewg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
