On Jan 25, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Roland Dreier (rdreier) wrote: > The fact that OFED is considering shipping ummunotify also could be used > to help the process -- if it does seem to be degenerating into an > unbounded discussion, we can say, "look, this is sufficiently painful to > the MPI guys that they are going to ship out-of-tree hacks if we can't > come up with a plan for the mainline kernel."
True. > But if there's going to be zero engagement with the upstream kernel from > any OFED developers prior to just giving up and shipping ummunotify, > then that's not a good sign for the OFED development process. Fair enough. But to be accurate, in the absence of information, I think everyone was waiting for you. :-) If you don't have the time/resources to do so, perhaps someone else could take up this effort? (hint, hint) Tziporet -- is there someone at Mellanox would could look at the ummunotify-on-perf suggestions that the kernel community had? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
