> > Well, I think you are right. This kind of change seems appropriate to > > me for mainline, but OFED/RHEL should carry a responsibility to manage > > an identified incompatibility, either patch their kernel, patch their > > OMPI, or publish an errata. That is the role of a distribution. > > RHEL has said, multiple times, that they rely on OpenFabrics to do the Right > Thing. They don't do a lot of testing, validating, etc.
In that case OFED plays the role of distribution. -- Roland Dreier <[email protected]> Cisco.com - http://www.cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
