>Address mapping policies depend on the address type. This patch only >defines a policy for mapping link-local addresses, and we should >indeed take care not to change it (if possible). >Later on, we can add more policies for other address types (e.g., >normal IPv6 addresses, mapped IPv4 addresses, etc.) >> >> Or maybe it is device-specific, and we could wrap it up into the create >> AH uverbs call we already have? > >Interesting idea. Not sure what is better here: a seperate ABI >call or some additional 'u8 ctx[32]' field in struct >ib_uverbs_create_ah_resp that will be interpreted by the hw-specific >user-space driver.
I don't understand why mapping remote addresses should be driver specific. _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
