On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Aleksey Senin wrote:

> When using slow SM allow more packets to be buffered before answer
> comming back. This patch based on idea of Christoph Lameter.

I agree, I think we need to have those things configurable.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

How do you handle the situation of the SM responding before the fabric has
been reconfigured? I do not see any delay on join. So they will be dropped
if the fabric was not reconfigured fast enough? Or does the SM somehow
delay the response?
_______________________________________________
ewg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

Reply via email to