This white paper should help you answer that question: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/outlook/CliNetTraf.asp ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:58 PM Subject: Outlook 2000 connecting to Exchange 2003
> > Is there a significant difference between using Outlook 2000 with an OST > and background synchronization connecting to Exchange 2003 versus using > Outlook 2003 in cached mode to connect to Exchange 2003? > > I want to recommend that all clients be upgraded to OL 2003 prior to our > migration. That does not appear like it is going to be possible. > > Thanks, > Ken Jasa > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: > Jupitermedia Corp. > Attn: Discussion List Management > 475 Park Avenue South > New York, NY 10016 > > Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
