Of course. Don't know if I understand it myself. I am an old preExchange 2K, ccMail guy who hates change. Basically we have 9 remote sites that are linked over a Satellite shared link. So they average around 100 kb. A good old sunspot just kills them. 4 other remote site are connected via fiber and have 256 or 512. So its the Sat links that concern me most.
I have read that running Exchange 5.5 on a DC that is a GC is not supported in any multi-Exchange site. If that is the case I'll have to add other box to run it. Thank for your reply. Mort Billups Crowley Maritime Corporation -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement Without knowing a lot more about your environment, I can't say whether I share your concern or not. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 9:19 AM > Posted To: swynk > Conversation: ADC connection agreement > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > I am concerned with the GCs replicating over the link and > having to possibly have another DC in place to host the GC. > Cost maybe being an issue there. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 9:13 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > Exchange 200x needs to communicate with GCs. If you're > planning to install Exchange into the remote site, it would > seem to make more sense for it to communicate with one in the > site rather than over a satellite link for each directory > lookup it wants to do. > > -- > Chris Scharff > Messaging Services Architect > MessageOne > [o] 512.652.4500 x244 > [m] 512.560.2984 > [f] 512.652.4504 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Posted At: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 7:38 AM > > Posted To: swynk > > Conversation: ADC connection agreement > > Subject: FW: ADC connection agreement > > > > > > Little update. I am using ADC from ex2ksp3. Deploying Ex2k. > > Further information: This ADC agreement is between Exchange > > 5.5SP4/DC that resides in a child domain. The only CGs I > > have are in the parent domain. I have figured out that these > > 8 accounts would not replicate because the 'Manager field in > > their mailboxes has a mailbox from the parent domain. When I > > removed this Manager the account and mailbox replicate. I > > have found if I promote the Domain Controller in the child > > domain to a CG this resolves the issue. > > > > I have 13 remote Exchange 5.5SP4 sites (Satellite links) in > > their own Win2k domains. These are single Servers hosting > > Exchange and DC. I have done a lot of reading and understand > > that I can't make all these servers GCs and that it is > > necessary to have one GC in each domain that Ex2k is > > installed in? Not to mention the added Network traffic. > > > > Can this work in my present configuration. Any help or > > pointers much appreciated. > > > > Mort Billups > > Crowley Maritime Corporation > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Billups, Morton > > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 7:39 AM > > To: 'Exchange Discussions' > > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > > > > Yes, many many times. > > Yes, lost count how many times. > > Yes, as stated 8022 and 8070 description below. > > > > I have made some progress. As stated below 8 of 143 mailboxes and > > 2 DLs would not replicate. What I have discovered is if the mailbox > > manager's > > field is modified with a mailbox from another Site > > replication will fail. > > If the DL has a member from another site replication will fail. > > I don't know why this is happening yet, but I feel a little > closer to > > solving it. > > So that is where my focus is currently. Thanks again for > your reply. > > > > PS.. If anyone wants to know how I troubleshot this I'll try > > to describe it. > > > > > > Mort Billups > > Crowley Maritime Corporation > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed > > Crowley [MVP] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 9:34 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > > > > Have you verified that the ADC is running? Have you changed > > an attribute on > > a properly connected mailbox and watched to see if it gets > > reflected on the > > other side? Have you looked at the event log for any errors > > on the server > > on which the ADC is running? > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 4:24 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > > They are all in the default Recipient container. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > > Of Ed Crowley > > [MVP] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 6:38 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > > > > That means that the ADC should try to replicate them. It'll > > skip ones that > > have the ADC-Global-Names attribute filled in. These > > mailboxes aren't in a > > different container, are they? > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:15 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > > Thanks for replying! Since my last post I tried to do that, > > but when viewing > > the raw properties of the mailbox the ADC-Global-Names > > attributes are not > > set (blank). You can only see the object ADC-Global-Names if > > the view is set > > to ALL. > > > > I have also reinstalled the ADC (ex2ksp3 flavor), but I > same results. > > > > Probably related is 2 DL won't replicate to AD. A new DL will > > replicate just > > fine. > > > > Still digging! > > > > Mort Billups > > Crowley Maritime Corporation > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > > Of Ed Crowley > > [MVP] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 1:27 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > > > > I see what you're trying to do. Start Exchange 5.5 > > Administrator in Raw > > Mode (admin /r). Open the raw properties of each > disconnected mailbox > > (Shift-Enter) and remove the ADC-Global-Names attribute. The > > next time the > > ADC runs it should create a new disabled user or connect the > > mailbox to the > > corresponding AD user. > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 11:15 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > > I don't think I can do that. I don't have any E2k servers > > running. If I can > > ever figure out this problem maybe I'll get to install one? I > > am just tying > > to get these 8 Ex5.5 mailboxes synchronize with their AD > > accounts. I have 12 > > other remote Ex5.5 sites so I want to get this working > > correctly before > > proceeding. > > > > Mort Billups > > Crowley Maritime Corporation > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > > Of Ed Crowley > > [MVP] > > Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:44 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > > > > In ESM under the mailbox store list the mailboxes. > > Right-click one and > > select to Reconnect. > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 4:20 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: ADC connection agreement > > > > Thanks for the reply. I did remove the Exchange attributes > > and restarted the > > ADC. > > That didn't work unfortunately. What exactly does > > reconnecting a mailbox > > mean? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > > Of Mike Lagase > > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:16 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: ADC connection agreement > > > > > > Try removing the Exchange attributes for one user and then > > reconnecting that > > > > mailbox to the AD user. See if that then replicates properly. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:19 PM > > Subject: ADC connection agreement > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have one ADC two way connection agreement setup to > > replicate users > > > and mailboxes. There are 8 users/mailboxes that won't > > > synchronize/replicate out of 143 users in this site. None > of these > > > mailboxes/accounts have ADC-Global-Names or msExchADCGlobalNames. > > > Event gives an 8022 and 8070 error which states that LDAP > > modify fails > > > because "No Such Object' exist. I am running Ex5.5sp4 and > > > Win2ksp4 Native. I have upgraded ADC to Ex2k3sp1, recreated the > > > agreements and done a lot of swearing so far. So far I > haven't been > > > able to duplicate this in my Lab. > > > > > > I have two other Exchange 5.5 Sites with ADCs setup. They > > are working > > > just fine. The only obvious difference to me is that the > > third site's > > > accounts are in a child AD domain. > > > > > > I would appreciate any suggestions. I poor head hurts from > > reading so > > > many KB articles and searching the Web. > > > > > > Mort Billups > > > Crowley Maritime Corporation > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Web Interface: > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: > > Jupitermedia Corp. > > Attn: Discussion List Management > > 475 Park Avenue South > > New York, NY 10016 > > > > Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: > Jupitermedia Corp. > Attn: Discussion List Management > 475 Park Avenue South > New York, NY 10016 > > Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: > Jupitermedia Corp. > Attn: Discussion List Management > 475 Park Avenue South > New York, NY 10016 > > Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. > > > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
