Josh references an article regarding "Server Side Rules" and Public Folders. I do not believe the OoO works on Pub folders...
Nikki Peterson -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 12:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OoO question Yeah, but that's not an Out of Office. The risk of a loop from an Out of Office without a rule is small because the Out of Office message is sent only once to each sender. Add a rule to the Out of Office, however, and you might have a problem because the rules, whether added in Out of Office or the Rules Wizard, fire for all messages. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nikki Peterson - EGOVX Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OoO question Scenario: - Public Folder (PF) has a rule to reply to EVERY mail received with a "Thank you". - A message is received by that PF from an automailer. - The PF sends a "Thank You" to the automailer. - The Automailer doesn't accept messages. - The Automailer sends a message (via server) that messages are not accepted. - The PF receives the message from the server telling it that Messages are not accepted. - The PF sends a "Thank You" to the server message. - The Server message sends a message that messages are not accepted. - The PF receives the message and sends a "Thank you"... - etc. Nikki Peterson -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horner, Josh Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OoO question I know this is a boring topic but does this MS KB article still carry the looping danger? http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=291956 It doesn't reference any dangers of looping conditions. I seem to remember reading on slipstick somewhere (cant' find it now) that server auto-replies function similar to OOO in that they won't reply to every message from a sender but only once every 24 hour period. Is this true? - Josh -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OoO question HAHAHAHAHAHAHA: To work around this issue, divide your Exchange Server 5.5 organization into multiple Exchange 2000 or Exchange Server 2003 organizations. In this scenario, because these message settings are organization-wide settings, you must use more than one Active Directory directory service forest. That's just silly right there. Since my ChooseFrom debacle, I've been very hesitant about ivasoft -- the developer doesn't seem to respond to queries and/or problems. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OoO question Take a look at: http://www.ivasoft.biz/selectiveoof.shtml More info: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;840158 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horner, Josh Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 7:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OoO question Hi Everyone, We've recently opened OoO replies to the internet. Is there any way to block this on a user basis? Thanks for any info. - Josh _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
