I'll offer that I've noticed in situations where I've upgraded from Exchange 5.5 to 2000 or 2003 the recipient policies that are automatically created in the process use a filter rules format something like this: (&(mailNickname=*)(legacyExchangeDN=/O=OrgName/OU=SiteName/*))
Where OrgName is your Exchange Organization name and Where SiteName is your Exchange Administrative Group Name (which is linked to the Exchange 5.5 site being upgraded) Both being the actual names, which may or may not match their corresponding display names. As far as I can tell using this filter rules format would exactly fit your request to scope policies to specific AGs. Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Wahlers Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policies questions Hello colleagues, In Exchange 2003, I have created a separate Recipient Policy for each of our organizations, and each organization is on its own Exchange server in its own Administrative Group so they can admin their own stuff. The recipient policies have addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] so we can automagically get our [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses created. I have two questions. The first one is important; the second one is just odd: 1. Can a particular Recipient Policy be applied to one Administrative Group and not another? So, could I have the LHM Recipient Policy apply to the LHM Administrative Group, or even to their particular Exchange server, and not to others? And the STL Recipient Policy apply to the STL Administrative Group and not to the LHM Administrative Group? 2. When I created the LHM Recipient Policy, it came up in the list with a priority of 1 instead of a priority of Highest. Why is that? The only two things different about it are: 1. It is the only server in its Administrative Group, and it's 2003, whereas the other Administrative Groups have a 2003 and a 5.5 server in them. 2. It's in a different domain in the forest from the other Exchange servers - but there's a 2-way trust. Thanks, all. You continue to be the greatest! -- Larry Wahlers Concordia Technologies The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
