Given those numbers - I'd start with the Exchange 2007 storage calculator.  
Depending on whether or not the mailbox SIZE is actually 2GB (versus a quota), 
you're going to be spending a LOT of money and disks on IOPS delivery instead 
of capacity delivery.  Not that it's a bad thing -- just an
expensive thing in money, power and footprint for your SAN.

Microsoft is also pushing direct-attached storage again for Exchange.  There 
are some good Microsoft IT whitepapers on the topic.  This is to reduce 
complexity and to deliver those all-important IOPS for cheaper.

I'd also go to CA/XOSoft and ask them for a justification over Exchange 2007 
SP1 SCR.  MessageOne certainly still has better features, but I haven't looked 
at XOSoft yet (and we're even an XOSoft shop for Exchange 2003, today).

Don't forget to add IOPS for BES users.  Because BES isn't a cached mode 
connection, and the service account is making so many MAPI calls to the 
mailboxes, it can easily require 3-6 time the IOPS as a cached mode Outlook 
2007 client.  The calculator has a spot for 'extra IOPS' to build some in.

You can download the calculator here:

http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/01/15/432207.aspx


This is the same sizing tool that any (and every) consultant or services group 
will be using...so it should be very helpful to tell you what you're dealing 
with for hardware and storage requirements.


For backup strategy - I highly recommend looking at DPM 2007 from Microsoft. 


--James


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chee Lam
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Design Best Practices Questions

Dear List:

Given scenario of 1500 - 2000 users with mailbox size of 2GB each
spread all over north america. There will be BES in place too.
How would one design an Exchange environment that covers high
availability, redundant with failover and good backup strategy?
Need to pick some ideas from the real world experts :)
things I am considering: SAN, redundant WAN links, second site with
third party failover (XO soft?) at least 2-4 servers per site?

Any comments appreciated.
Thanks.
Chee

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange
To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange
To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Reply via email to