Thanks that's helpful. I will have between 100 - 175 "part time" users mostly accessing from mobile devices and OWA. Thinking of using the E2 SAL at $6 or deploying on-prem .
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Monday, September 2, 2013 11:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Exchange] 2010 SP2 UR7 or SP UR2 For small numbers of servers... probably 2-ish hours per month. The more you have, the larger economies of scale you can implement, using tools for server lifecycle management (ConfigMgr with OpsMgr and others of that ilk) until you get to the largest environments where you will just automatically reimage every server every month or so. But that does mean you have more people involved in server management, just handling more servers per person. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ryan Finnesey Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 10:28 PM To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Exchange] 2010 SP2 UR7 or SP UR2 How much time do you find it takes to maintain the servers? I am trying to decide whether to go Office 365 or not for a new Exchange deployment Sent from my iPad mini On Aug 31, 2013, at 8:55 AM, "Michael B. Smith" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I would do SP3, then UR2. In fact, I did that for 5 clients last weekend. :) From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Stovall Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 4:36 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Exchange] 2010 SP2 UR7 or SP UR2 Currently running Exchange 2010 SP2 UR6 on a single server in a small domain. Any strong thoughts one way or the other out there about whether the next update should be to SP2 UR7, or SP3 then UR2? Thanks, RS
