But that takes time... But seriously, thanks to both of you for the insight. Standard method it is.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]>wrote: > As Mr. Sobey suggested – I wouldn’t do a P2V. I would fire up a new VM > and do a standard transition to a new server.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Richard Stovall > *Sent:* Monday, September 9, 2013 6:33 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Exchange] Exchange 2010 P2V?**** > > ** ** > > I am retiring the hardware my single Exchange 2010 server lives on.**** > > ** ** > > I have a shiny new Hyper-V 2012 deployment and I'm thinking of > virtualizing Exchange. Are there any strong thoughts out there about doing > a P2V of the server versus standing up a brand new one and moving the > mailboxes and public folders? We have ~50 users and the databases are > ~350GB in total size.**** > > ** ** > > I do not have SCVMM. (Can't afford it.)**** > > ** ** > > Cheers,**** > > ** ** > > RS**** >
