Didn't the original issue have to do with throttling mailboxes that were growing too fast, or something like that? Are the logs showing the same thing?
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Jonathan Link <[email protected]>wrote: > I think it's called backup. It may involve the use of DAGs. I dunno... > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:39 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Once again I called PSS only to have my case refunded, and no solution. >> >> After 5 days, and about 50 hours on the phone, PSS' only resolution was >> "create a new VM install a new exchange and mount the DB". >> >> I will say that I did get great insight into exchange , more than any >> class or course would ever give, however, after the "solution" I'm still >> getting random users mailboxes going to quarantine, and now they propose; >> >> 1. Move the mailbox if that fails >> 2. Run online repair if that fails >> 3. Offline repair if that fails >> 4. Delete and recreate mailbox >> >> I'm not that upset because this is after all a small exchange deployment >> (~60 users) , what if this happened on a large scale, this is not exactly >> what "PSS" Is supposed to do , it ? >> > >
