I completely agree with your frustration on all points. -- Espi
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Maglinger, Paul <[email protected]>wrote: > Meeting a lot of user resistance because "we used to do it this way". > We have a common voicemail/email box for helpdesk. They rotate on-call and > before the Unity upgrade they would just modify the forwarding rule for the > common mailbox. I did set it up as in the article and gave them rights to > be able to change it. They're not happy about it. The other thing is if > you use rules to play a sound or move the voicemail to another folder, > those won't work either. And the concept suggested in the article to have > 2 inboxes for every account that wants to use rule is simply ludicrous. > > > > IMHO, if something comes into your Inbox, you're rules should work on it. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Micheal Espinola Jr > *Sent:* Friday, April 18, 2014 4:08 PM > *To:* exchange > *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] Something your Cisco sales person will not tell > you about Cisco Unity > > > > Is the posted workaround something viable for you? Im pretty sure I have > done that successfully myself in the past. > > > -- > Espi > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Maglinger, Paul <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This used to work with version 8. It broke in version 9 and 10. It would > have been nice if we'd known about it. > > > https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/69491/single-inbox-and-working-outlook-rules > > Here's to hoping you don't make the same mistake. > > -Paul > > >
