While there is a setting inside the MTA to adjust this knowing you are using 
EOP (or any 3rd-party app in that niche) means it won't make any difference. 
The world is not connecting to your MTA; the world is connecting to EOP thus 
the banner is what EOP presents. You'll need to contact MS support for EOP.

NB: EMC:Server Config:Props on <Receive connector in question>: General tab. 
Halfway down is "Specify the FQDN this connector will provide in response to 
HELO or EHLO"

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Exchange] RE: MTA Banner
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:54:31 +0000









Michael, Ok, makes sense.
 
But I would still need to fix the MTA banner issue.

 
Our 2 Exchange servers are both running HUB, CAS, MBX roles and according to 
TechNet I cannot change the FQDN so easily.
 
>From Technet:
If the Send connector is configured on a Hub Transport server that also has the 
Mailbox server role installed, any value that you
 specify for the Fqdn parameter isn't used. Instead, the FQDN of the server 
that's displayed by using the Get-ExchangeServer cmdlet is always used.
For servers that have both the Hub Transport server role and the Mailbox server 
role installed, the only way to remove the server
 name from the Received: headers of the outgoing message is to use the 
Remove-ADPermission cmdlet to remove the Ms-Exch-Send-Headers-Routing 
permission from the security principals that use the connector. This action 
will remove all the Received: headers
 from the message as the message leaves the Hub Transport server. We recommend 
that you don't remove the Received: headers for internal messages, because the 
Received: headers are used for maximum hop count calculations. For more 
information about theRemove-ADPermission cmdlet
 
 
So should I run something along these lines:
Get-SendConnector "MyPartner_SendConnector" | Remove-ADPermission -User "NT 
AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON" -ExtendedRights "Ms-Exch-Send-Headers-Routing"
 
To me it seems running this command would just remove headers and not solve the 
problem (ie MTA banner must equal certificate CN)
 
Thank you.
 
 


 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith

Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:27 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: [Exchange] RE: MTA Banner


 
You have to create a specific send connector for this partner and you must 
directly connect to that partner (I.e., don’t use EOP for them).
 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Thomas Capacci

Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 9:56 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: [Exchange] MTA Banner


 
Hi,
 
A partner organization wants to secure email flow with TLS with us.
They send me the result of their testing:
 
The MTA cannot be validated if the CN subject of the certificate doesn't match 
the banner of the mail gateway or the rdns entry. To resolve this issue the 
banner
 of the mail gateway must be renamed to match the CN subject of the certificate 
or a new certificate must be installed. MessageLabs cannot configure an 
Enforced TLS connection if the MTA cannot be validated.
 
We have a 2 node DAG (Exchange 2010 Sp2 UR5) running behind a TMG 2010 server, 
all outbound/inbound emails are passing through Exchange Online Protection.
 
Where exactly should I rename the banner?
 
Some TechNet posts points to both the FQDN used in Exchange Send and Receive 
connectors (Property: Specify the FQDN this connector will provide in response
 to HELO or EHLO).
For now the values are serverhostname.corp.acme.local, so I guess I should 
change it on all send/receive connectors to the same used in our SSL certificate
 which is webmail.acme.com
 
Confusion comes from the fact we use EOP so I am not sure if changing the FQDN 
on our Exchange hosts will change anything as all traffic is redirected to EOP
 servers for outbound/inbound spam inspection.
 
Thank you.
 
 
                                          

Reply via email to