(Let's try that again, with the link this time.)

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Richard Stovall <[email protected]> wrote:

> I also have a much more complicated one that does counts and whatnot
> without the SQL folks being involved.  It is based on the following:
>

http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/bb94b422-eb9e-4c53-a454-f7da6ddfb5d6

Reply via email to