That's a damn shame. Again, a darn good read. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Exchange] Isolated DAG member still allow local email???
It is one of many great things that Scott wrote. I still can't believe he was hit in the layoffs a few weeks ago. He and Ross Smith IV are probably the two best Exchange writers around... From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:46 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [Exchange] Isolated DAG member still allow local email??? After Michael jarred my memory I found the following: http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/05/31/exchange-2010-high-availability-misconceptions-addressed.aspx which is a darn good read. -Paul From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rami SIK Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 11:42 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: OT: [Exchange] Isolated DAG member still allow local email??? Would you suggest any good reading for DAG and DAC for Exchange 2013 except just googling it? Rami From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ccollins9 Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 5:57 PM To: exchange Subject: Re: [Exchange] Isolated DAG member still allow local email??? Yeah, that's what it's called, I knew you could do it. On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This is the use case for the alternate witness server. ________________________________ If this message is not meant for you, do not use it - please let us know, and then delete it. We try hard to keep our messages and attachments free of viruses and other malicious programs, but are not liable if our precautions don't prevent their spread.
