Just for clarity - that parameter does not apply to Exchange 2013.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Susan Bradley
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 1:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: Exchange 2013 application relay issue

Keep in mind that that Exchange 2007 had a throttle value on it courtesy of the 
coding team of SBS 2008.

*msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax*.  64000


Just throwing that out as a fyi.

On 12/18/2014 10:40 PM, Daniel Chenault wrote:
> I would expect a resource shortage or throttling.
> Take a network trace. The wire never lies.
> *From:* James Hill <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2014 6:52 PM
> *To:* [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Subject:* RE: [Exchange] RE: Exchange 2013 application relay issue
>
> Thanks Daniel.
>
> It is using a 3^rd party plugin of some sort.  The challenge is that 
> the issue did not occur on the previous server which was an SBS server 
> with Exchange 2007.  So the LOB app providers point the finger at what 
> has changed (the new exchange server).  I see their point.
>
> Why does restarting the Transport service resolve the issue?  Does it 
> force close a stuck connection perhaps?
>
> James.
>
> *From:*[email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Daniel Chenault
> *Sent:* Friday, 19 December 2014 12:45 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] RE: Exchange 2013 application relay issue
>
> Remote(socket error) specifically means the remote socket did not 
> acknowledge a packet. I'd focusing my efforts on the LOB app.
> Hopefully it has extended logging of some type.
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2014, at 18:42, "James Hill" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hmm.. I can’t see it there Michael.  Here is the log:-
>
>     
> 2014-12-18T23:17:34.874Z,SERVER\AppRelay,08D1E88C8D1C474A,30,192.168.2.21:25,192.168.2.103:52572,>,250
>     2.1.5 Recipient OK,
>
>     2014-12-18T23:17:34.890Z, SERVER
>     
> \AppRelay,08D1E88C8D1C474A,31,192.168.2.21:25,192.168.2.103:52572,<,DA
> TA,
>
>     
> 2014-12-18T23:17:34.890Z,SERVER\AppRelay,08D1E88C8D1C474A,32,192.168.2.21:25,192.168.2.103:52572,>,354
>     Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>,
>
>     
> 2014-12-18T23:18:43.656Z,SERVER\AppRelay,08D1E88C8D1C474A,33,192.168.2
> .21:25,192.168.2.103:52572,-,,Remote(SocketError)
>
>     James.
>
>     *From:*[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Michael B.
>     Smith
>     *Sent:* Friday, 19 December 2014 12:29 PM
>     *To:* [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     *Subject:* [Exchange] RE: Exchange 2013 application relay issue
>
>     You need to know which socketerror it is. If you enable verbose
>     logging on the connector, the error number is one of the fields.
>
>     *From:*[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *James Hill
>     *Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2014 7:55 PM
>     *To:* [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     *Subject:* [Exchange] Exchange 2013 application relay issue
>
>     I’m currently investigating an issue for a client with Exchange
>     2013.  They have a single Exchange 2013 SP1 server running in a
>     2012 R2 VM on 2012 R2 Hyper-V Host.
>
>     I have configured a receive connector (Apprelay) that allows their
>     LOB app (a payroll program) to send out emails.
>
>     From time to time the LOB app crashes while attempting to send out
>     emails via the Apprelay connector.  After restarting the LOB app
>     it still isn’t able to send emails.  However, restarting the
>     Exchange Transport service temporarily resolves the issue.
>
>     When it fails the SMTP log on the exchange server shows a socket
>     error:-
>
>     250 2.1.5 Recipient OK
>
>     DATA
>
>     354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
>
>     Remote(SocketError)
>
>     I’m not sure where to look for the cause from here.  Network
>     layer? Suggestions please?
>
>     James.
>



Reply via email to