We would be trying to cover our bases for our journalists so they can protect their sources...I'm looking into Proofpoint, Barracuda, Symantec and also something I can integrate using our already owned Sonicwall devices.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Davies, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: > It depends what you think the risk is. Are you protecting internal > emails between staff? External emails to trusted (known) partners? > External emails to anyone? > > > > For external, TLS is the easiest answer if your threat is mail in > transit. Opportunistic should just be set anyway. Mandatory would be > between agreed organisations. There are mail gateway appliances you can > buy which can define policy based encryption too. > > > > For internal and the ability to email anyone, anywhere with encryption, > you may want to look at S/MIME or PGP Mail. Fairly straightforward, but > you will have a user education piece to go with it! This is the only way > of ensuring user to user encryption rather than just in transit. > > > > And no, it’s not all that paranoid at all. In fact, most regulated > industries have been doing one or all of the above for a long time … J > > > > > > > > > > a > > CLS Classification: Confidential Information > > This email was classified by Davies, Alan on 26 February 2015 09:31:19. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Kennedy, Jim > *Sent:* 25 February 2015 20:10 > *To:* Micheal Espinola Jr > *Subject:* RE: [Exchange] Email encryption > > > > It helps to a certain point. I just don’t think with all the government > data dumps being done that we have any real privacy on the net anymore. So > your encrypted email is only as good as the various governments that are > copying it and storing it currently. > > > > So probably pretty good and worth the effort, but not as good as perhaps > your users think it will be. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Steve Ens > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2015 2:58 PM > *To:* Micheal Espinola Jr > *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] Email encryption > > > > Tell me more Jim, why are you cynical? Because they can get in anyway? > Or what? > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Kennedy, Jim < > [email protected]> wrote: > > They are right, but encryption won’t help. I suggest written notes sent > via trusted employee with said employee videotaping the recipient eating > the message after reading it. Then shooting the delivery guy when he gets > back. > > > > Sorry, couldn’t resist. My cynical hat is on today. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Ens > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2015 2:18 PM > *To:* Micheal Espinola Jr > *Subject:* [Exchange] Email encryption > > > > The news gatherers think that their messages are highly sensitive and > don't trust regular email any longer. Is anyone encrypting? What is the > preferred method? This is new to me. > > Thanks > > Steve > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > WARNING: > This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the > individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not > disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender > immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete > this e-mail from your system. > E-mails are not encrypted and cannot be guaranteed to be secure or > error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not > accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message > which arise as a result of this e-mail transmission. If verification is > required, please request a hard copy version. > "CLS Services Ltd x Registered in England No 4132704 x Registered Office: > Exchange Tower x One Harbour Exchange Square x London x E14 9GE" > > > >
