We would be trying to cover our bases for our journalists so they can
protect their sources...I'm looking into Proofpoint, Barracuda, Symantec
and also something I can integrate using our already owned Sonicwall
devices.

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Davies, Alan <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  It depends what you think the risk is.  Are you protecting internal
> emails between staff?  External emails to trusted (known) partners?
> External emails to anyone?
>
>
>
> For external, TLS is the easiest answer if your threat is mail in
> transit.  Opportunistic should just be set anyway.  Mandatory would be
> between agreed organisations.  There are mail gateway appliances you can
> buy which can define policy based encryption too.
>
>
>
> For internal and the ability to email anyone, anywhere with encryption,
> you may want to look at S/MIME or PGP Mail.  Fairly straightforward, but
> you will have a user education piece to go with it!  This is the only way
> of ensuring user to user encryption rather than just in transit.
>
>
>
> And no, it’s not all that paranoid at all.  In fact, most regulated
> industries have been doing one or all of the above for a long time …  J
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> a
>
>  CLS Classification: Confidential Information
>
> This email was classified by Davies, Alan on 26 February 2015 09:31:19.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Kennedy, Jim
> *Sent:* 25 February 2015 20:10
> *To:* Micheal Espinola Jr
> *Subject:* RE: [Exchange] Email encryption
>
>
>
> It helps to a certain point. I just don’t think with all the government
> data dumps being done that we have any real privacy on the net anymore.  So
> your encrypted email is only as good as the various governments that are
> copying it and storing it currently.
>
>
>
> So probably pretty good and worth the effort, but not as good as perhaps
> your users think it will be.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Steve Ens
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2015 2:58 PM
> *To:* Micheal Espinola Jr
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] Email encryption
>
>
>
> Tell me more Jim, why are you cynical?  Because they can get in anyway?
> Or what?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Kennedy, Jim <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> They are right, but encryption won’t help. I suggest written notes sent
> via trusted employee with said employee videotaping the recipient eating
> the message after reading it.  Then shooting the delivery guy when he gets
> back.
>
>
>
> Sorry, couldn’t resist. My cynical hat is on today.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Ens
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2015 2:18 PM
> *To:* Micheal Espinola Jr
> *Subject:* [Exchange] Email encryption
>
>
>
> The news gatherers think that their messages are highly sensitive and
> don't trust regular email any longer.  Is anyone encrypting?  What is the
> preferred method?  This is new to me.
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> WARNING:
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> individual named.  If you are not the named addressee, you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender 
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
> this e-mail from your system.
> E-mails are not encrypted and cannot be guaranteed to be secure or 
> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore does not 
> accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message 
> which arise as a result of this e-mail transmission.  If verification is 
> required, please request a hard copy version.
> "CLS Services Ltd x Registered in England No 4132704 x Registered Office: 
> Exchange Tower x One Harbour Exchange Square x London x E14 9GE"
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to