To date I've only found one place in which I couldn't get dial up access to
our provider, yet that I could get web access. That happened to be
Vladivostock, Russia. Fortunately, work was the last thing on my mind at
that time, so this wasn't a problem.
OWA isn't a great solution. But it is a solution for certain situations that
can't be handled any other way, which happens to be a situation that I'm
facing right now, and having to fix using OWA.
Roger
------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Network Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 7:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SSL Question
>
>
> But Ed wouldn't a VPN require transport or tunnel peering?
> This probably
> wouldn't be realistic from all locations. If all sessions are from
> administrable hosts then I'd agree that a vpn would be ideal.
> Maybe i'm
> missing something. more info would help.
>
> Rob, either way, given the cost and flexibility I'd use ssl for OWA.
> Overhead would be contingent on your pipes, etc, but probably
> won't be an
> issue. As you know, right now the payload of your http
> transactions is "in
> the clear".
>
> my thoughts.byron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 4:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SSL Question
>
>
> No. You're stupid not to be employing a VPN.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> All your base are belong to us.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Moore
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 6:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: SSL Question
>
>
> Hello all--
>
> We currently don't use SSL for our remote OWA transactions,
> though we do use
> Windows Integrated Authentication to encrypt passwords. We
> are not carrying
> on communication which it's critical to have encrypted, so I made the
> judgement that encrypting everything wasn't worth the overhead of SSL.
>
> So, I guess my question is, Is that judgement wrong? Are we
> really stupid
> not to be using SSL on OWA?
>
> Rob
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Rob Moore
> Network Administrator
> The Agnes Irwin School
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
