Really E2K handles FE / BE through a DMZ much better than Exchange 5.5.
But, as I suggested earlier (before this message appeared!) pushing port 443
through to the intranet would probably be relatively safe.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS Front End to OWA 2000?
> ------------ Original Message -----------
> From: Rocky Stefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:48:32 -0400
>
> Have you ever tried this? http://www.horde.org/imp/ . Its a nice front
> imap
> implementation.
In light of some additional information I've come across (specifically
security discussions on the pros and cons of a DMZ F/E B/E OWA
implementation), I think I'm just going to bypass the DMZ altogether and
open 443 straight to the mailbox server.
Any thoughts on this (I'm sure there are plenty). Thanks for input.
Eric
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
