Why? It could've been fun playing water polo with them.
-----Original Message-----
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC this year
MEC has been cancelled this year due to sharks in the hotel pools in
Orlando.
Walt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:34 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Mailbox sizes: Incoming/Outgoing message limits
>
>
> Does anyone know where MEC is this year?
>
>
> Andy David
> J Muller International
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Mailbox sizes: Incoming/Outgoing message limits
>
>
> I'll have to disagree. If your business is graphic design or something
> similar, then you have a real need to send and receive large
> attachments.
> Your design should reflect your need. If I need to have
> bigger servers,
> mailboxes and or internet connections to meet these needs
> then you should be
> able to write a justification for the purchase. Having no
> limits at all in
> place would not be a great idea unless you like having users
> call because
> their mailbox is over the limit or your IMS is trying to
> deliver a 1GB video
> that someone made.
>
> It is a business decision with technical implications.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:18 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Mailbox sizes: Incoming/Outgoing message limits
> >
> > Where I used to work, the most common reason for me getting
> paged at 3 am
> > was because someone was sending their Napster directories
> from work to
> > home using E-mail (this was a very large and well-known
> organization that
> > happened to be run by idiots). While the need for limits should be
> > obvious to everyone on this group, we are often not in a position to
> > impose these policies.
> >
> > The truth is that if anything it is more a technical decision than
> > business, due to the fact that the main implication is
> system performance.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > > ------------ Original Message -----------
> > > From: Steve Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:01:59 -0400
> > >
> > > The need for limits is not obvious at all.
> > >
> > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/30/01 03:48PM >>>
> > > Wouldn't this be more of a business decision than a technical one?
> > > Obviously
> > > there are limits that need to be in place. If you set
> prohibit send and
> > > receive at 50MB on the mailboxes, then you should set the
> IMS lower.
> > Other
> > > than that, the question is, what do your users need to
> send and receive?
> > >
> > > Us = 8MB in, 5MB out.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Sethi, Ali [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:44 AM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: Mailbox sizes: Incoming/Outgoing message limits
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > We are beginning to implement a policy of limiting all
> > incoming/outgoing
> > > > messages to 5mb. I just wanted a consensus of size
> limits are set by
> > > > other
> > > > companies. What size limit have you implemented?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
