The issue is that I do need sp4 somehow, as I am using Trend Micro ScanMail
for Exchange v3.51, which seems to need a new version of store.exe (provided
with sp4). Is it safe to keep sp4, yet restore only files related to the MTA
from sp3 and below, since the problem is specific to the MTA only. And in
this case, what are the files that I can replace without affecting Exchange
functionality?

Best Regards
Nizar El-Assaad


-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4


SP4 modified the schema of the databases. You did make a backup before
upgrading to SP4, right?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nizar El-Assaad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4


> Thank you Serdar for the reply, and yes both sides are at sp4.
>
> Regarding reverting back to sp3, does it actually work to restore on sp3
> whereas the latest backup was made after the upgrade to sp4? According to
MS
> PSS, you should install the same service packs before restoring.
>
> Best Regards
> Nizar El-Assaad
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
>
>
>
> Did you upgrade both sides to SP4?  Did you make any other changes after
the
> SP4 upgrade?
>
> As far as falling back to SP3, I'm afraid you'll have to restore from
> backup.  Exchange won't allow you to reinstall SP3 on top of SP4 or
> uninstall SP4.
>
> S/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:20 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
>
>
> Already did. I even tried to change it and assign a new port on both
sides.
> There is no use.
>
> Best Regards
> Nizar El-Assaad
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
>
>
> I'm assuming that the MTA static port assignment was done through a
registry
> change.  Verify that it's still there.  SP4 may have overwritten it.
>
> S>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
>
>
> Hello all
>
> I have two Exchange 5.5 sites with one server in each site (Windows NT
> Server 4.0/sp6a, Exchange 5.5/sp3 on both servers). I am using Exchange
> behind Proxy 2.0 in one site, and in order to make inter-site
communication
> possible, I had to assign a fixed TCP port for the MTA (I am using port
> 6000). It was working fine, until I upgraded from sp3 to sp4. Since then,
> messages are stuck in the MTA queue, and I get error messages every 10
> minutes that say:
> "An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality
> Table (LTAB) index: 4, NT/MTA error code: 1753. Comms error 1753, Bind
error
> 0, Remote Server Name TOM [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14)"
> I had this same problem in the first place (with Exchange sp3) before I
> assigned a static TCP port for the MTA (because of MS Proxy), and the
> solution was to assign this static port.
> Is there a way to fix this problem? And if not, can I revert back to sp3?
>
> Best Regards
> Nizar El-Assaad
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to