PResent the facts differently. Like in a graph. Managers are genetically
predisposed to prefer information in graphical form.
Seriously, if the message isn't getting across, try presenting it
differently. Once you understand how a boss wants information, it becomes
much easier to get the ideas through.
Roger
------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Mailbox size advice
>
>
> Larry:
>
> You bring up such good information and strike a very deep topic:
>
> "management have to make that decision, based upon you
> presenting the facts
> to them."
>
> I just wish management had a clue even when they are told the facts -
> repeatidly.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Erik L. Vesneski
> Internal Network Manager
> Epicentric, Inc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Mailbox size advice
>
>
> Welcome Luis,
>
> Your answer will depend heavily upon how you plan on
> using it. No,
> we don't recommend putting mail on the workstation, but
> keeping it on the
> server. We also can't answer if it is enough for us: You
> users and your
> management have to make that decision, based upon you
> presenting the facts
> to them.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luis Pérez Lazo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:02 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Mailbox size advice
>
>
> Hello
>
> I'd like to know your opinions on whether to let user's mail
> items on the
> server or in the wks and the size limit u recommend.
>
> We have less than 500 users connecting to Exchange 5.5 through Outlook
> 2000/97 in a LAN. Mail is left on the server and the size
> limit is set to
> 30MB but they want more.
> We are considering to move to Exchange 2000 where the server
> version allows
> only 15GB storage. Is this enough for us?
>
> Thanks in advance;
>
> Luis
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
