<Advertising mode on>
Dmitry's product isn't free, but it is such a great value add for developers
that one might argue it pays for itself quite easily... Especially given
that the price is for a /distributable version/.
<Advertising mode off>
Not free, but certainly not expensive.... And it allows the standard
"security enhancements" in Outlook to remain, protecting your environment
from lusers.
*************************************************************
Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071
*************************************************************
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook XP application
>
>
> Thanks Chris...guess the answer is that there is no "free"
> way to do it.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook XP application
>
>
> I believe he could use Redemption to bypass the security model:
> http://shareit1.element5.com/programs.html?productid=139568
>
> *************************************************************
> Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
> Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071
> *************************************************************
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Outlook XP application
> >
> >
> > I have a user who has built an application that accesses the
> > address book in
> > Outlook who just upgraded to XP. Of course he now gets a
> > message every time
> > the application tries to run about it being allowed to access
> > the address
> > book and for how long (no option for always allow). Does
> > anyone know how to
> > turn this feature off? I understand why it is there, but for this
> > particular user that is not a concern.
> >
> > Thanks for any suggestions (going back to Outlook 2000 is
> > something that I
> > would like to avoid btw).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]