<Advertising mode on>
Dmitry's product isn't free, but it is such a great value add for developers
that one might argue it pays for itself quite easily... Especially given
that the price is for a /distributable version/.
<Advertising mode off>
Not free, but certainly not expensive.... And it allows the standard
"security enhancements" in Outlook to remain, protecting your environment
from lusers.

*************************************************************
  Chris Scharff    [EMAIL PROTECTED]    www.swinc.com
  Simpler-Webb, Inc.      Austin, TX         +1-512-322-0071
************************************************************* 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook XP application
> 
> 
> Thanks Chris...guess the answer is that there is no "free" 
> way to do it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook XP application
> 
> 
> I believe he could use Redemption to bypass the security model:
> http://shareit1.element5.com/programs.html?productid=139568 
> 
> *************************************************************
>   Chris Scharff    [EMAIL PROTECTED]    www.swinc.com
>   Simpler-Webb, Inc.      Austin, TX         +1-512-322-0071
> ************************************************************* 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Outlook XP application
> > 
> > 
> > I have a user who has built an application that accesses the
> > address book in
> > Outlook who just upgraded to XP.  Of course he now gets a 
> > message every time
> > the application tries to run about it being allowed to access 
> > the address
> > book and for how long (no option for always allow).  Does 
> > anyone know how to
> > turn this feature off?  I understand why it is there, but for this
> > particular user that is not a concern.
> > 
> > Thanks for any suggestions (going back to Outlook 2000 is
> > something that I
> > would like to avoid btw).
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to