Its hardly patently stupid when that's what you've got to play with, and it
will support a *test* environment of two adults and 2 children under the age
of 5.

------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> 
> 
> Slow is an understatement!
> 
> And sufficient for what?
> 
> My point is not that it can't be done, but that it is
> patently stupid to do so.  And there's always some
> manager who'll say "but Microsoft says this is all it needs".
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Phil
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 24 September 2001 19:10
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > 
> > 
> > I have.  Can be slow at times, but it still works.  Check 
> > this out...I've
> > got a PC with a P2-266 and 64mb ram running W2K Server and it 
> > is a DC.  Used
> > to be a GC Server as well.  It is a bit slow, but it hasn't 
> > keeled over and
> > died yet.  I've also run W2K Pro on P133's and P166's also 
> > with 64mb ram.
> > It works.  Not extremely well, but sufficient.
> > 
> > Ben Winzenz, MCSE
> > Network/Systems Administrator
> > Peregrine Systems, Inc.
> > 
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:       Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent:       Monday, September 24, 2001 5:12 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject:    RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > 
> > Have you tried running Win2K on a PC which is Microsoft's 
> > minimum spec?
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > Phil Randal
> > Network Engineer
> > Herefordshire Council
> > Hereford, UK 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 23 September 2001 17:48
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ludicrous how?  My lab machines here at home don't come close 
> > > to meeting the
> > > minimum requirements and they run stuff fine.
> > > 
> > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> > > Tech Consultant
> > > Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
> > > All your base are belong to us.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> Randal, Phil
> > > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:54 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Microsoft's minimum specs are ludicrous to start with.
> > > 
> > > I just double what they say to get an almost realistic estimate.
> > > 
> > > Phil
> > > 
> > > ---------------------------------------------
> > > Phil Randal
> > > Network Engineer
> > > Herefordshire Council
> > > Hereford, UK
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: 21 September 2001 13:42
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I wonder why they doubled the specs when the OS is
> > > > essentially the same
> > > > as 2K with a new gui?
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> > > Great Cthulhu
> > > > Jones
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:03 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I thought they were ludicrous until I saw the requirements
> > > > for anything
> > > > named "XP".
> > > >
> > > > (:=
> > > > Great Cthulhu Jones
> > > > CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
> > > > http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
> > > > http://www.bad-managers.com
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> > Ed Crowley
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:54 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I thought it was Microsoft that drives the larger hardware. 
> > >  Seen the
> > > > minimum requirements for anything named "2000"?
> > > >
> > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> > > > Tech Consultant
> > > > Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
> > > > All your base are belong to us.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > > Bauer, Mr. Rick
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:03 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Must be a COMPAQ server guy--always solve problems with
> > > > bigger hardware.
> > > >
> > > > Rick Bauer
> > > > The Hill School
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to