That is true. In order to put OWA on a separate machine that doesn't host your mailboxes, you still have to install E2K on that box (which is not required in E5.5) and mark that box as FrontEnd Server. There has been extensive discussions in recent past on the list. You should find many helpful suggestions if you do a little more digging on the list's archive.
Andrew, MCSE (NT + W2K) + CCNA -----Original Message----- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Sunday, November 11, 2001 10:18 PM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conversation: OWA on Exchange 2000 Subject: OWA on Exchange 2000 We are looking at upgrading to E2K and currently have OWA setup on a web server seperate to our Exchange Server 5.5 machine. One of my technical guys after researching this has said that this configuration is not possible in a E2K enviroment. Is this true. Surely you can have a scenario where web part is in the DMZ and the actual exchange server is on the inside network, although I do realise that OWA is more integrated in E2K but I would have thought the web part would be transportable. Thanks Andy _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
