Then again the part of the RFC discussing this uses "should" rather than "must."
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:15 AM Subject: RE: ORB UK - cross post - long > I tested between the time you posted and the time I replied... and between > the time you replied and the time this reply was sent. What I did is > included below. At no point did I receive an error message and yet no > attempt was made at mail delivery either. > > To even entertain the possiblity your mail server might be RFC compliant, in > the latter test case below I should have received an NDR at some point, and > I have not. > > 220 Unauthorized access prohibited. > 250 Hello bv.com, pleased to meet you > 250 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender ok > 250 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient ok > 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself > 250 Ok > > 250 Rset state > 250 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender ok > 250 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient ok > 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself > 250 Ok > > -----Original Message----- > From: Schwartz, Jim > To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: 12/4/2001 8:15 AM > Subject: RE: ORB UK - cross post - long > > Chris, > > When did you test and what did you do? > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
