I didn't figure you were implying that.<G> I just wanted to clarify that logging the MTA and IMS would work for the outbound portion of this poor substitute for journaling. I can't imagine anyone actually doing it this way though. It really smacks of a masochistic exercise when compared to setting up a journaling server.
Besides, it was my poor choice of words to say monitoring server (referencing from earlier in the thread) instead of journaling server that probably prompted all of this. <G> Tom. -----Original Message----- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring email That's why I said "of course"! Did not mean to imply you were inaccurate, just trying to ensure complete understanding. (c)2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I(r) Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!(tm) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring email That's why I specified it was for inbound. For outbound he'd have to manually parse the logs. Journaling is the only sane option. We can't, however, assume that sanity will be the choice that is made.<G> As always, your tag line applies. Tom. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
