Everyone should be using something of that sort, we would have a much better email world that way.
-----Original Message----- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Sorry bud, but you're likely to make Martin mad since it's his list. Though everyone's should look about the same with varying differences here and there. D "Saving the world from Brick Level Backups and PST's" - Ed Crowley -----Original Message----- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's list of attachments to block! Thanks for everyone's input. I will try to talk then into keeping scanmail, and using NAV for servers and clients as a compromise. If they don't go for it, I will hope for a trouble free system like Tom and James have(but will keep Scanmail handy just incase) Thanks! Ron -----Original Message----- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be. -----Original Message----- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -----Original Message----- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -----Original Message----- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -----Original Message----- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round.... Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -----Original Message----- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
