That's called RPC, right?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha



-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site


Well, sorta. The directories talk to each other, er... directly.

----- Original Message -----
From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site


> Exchange 5.5 servers communicate through the MTA when they're in the same
> site.
>
> Missy
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Q" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 2:23 PM
> Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site
>
>
> What allows them to talk to each other, i.e. what connector x.400 through
> RPC?
> Can you tell Exchange which server to put the mailboxes?
>
> Thnaks,
> -John Q Jr.
> I checked the logs and there was no receipt of mail anyhere between
12:00 -
> 4:00 PST from msn.
>
> You did however receive mail from a @uophx.edu connection at 15:21:27.
>
> This confirms that you were getting mail at this time.?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Harford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 8:05 AM
> Subject: RE: NT4 Domain authnetication
>
>
>
> You really need to give us a load more info.  Is it part of an existing
> Ex5.5 set up with an ADC in place?  Did you use the ADMT or a third-party
> equivalent to "migrate" the users? Etc, etc.
>
> Mark
>
> Briefly though, you'll need to add the NT4 accounts into the mailbox
> permissions of the mailbox-enabled AD accounts you must have created.
This
> can be done through AD Users and Computers.  Ensure that you turn on the
> Advanced View and you'll see the necessary options under the "Exchange
> Advanced" Tab of the AD accounts properties.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 January 2002 04:37
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NT4 Domain authnetication
>
>
> Define "some test users were migrated over successfully."
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: NT4 Domain authnetication
>
>
> I have a customer who has an NT 4 domain and does not want to upgrade it
to
> AD yet.  He does want to use Exchange 2000.  We created a seperate AD
domain
> and installed E2K.  Two way trust were created between domains and some
test
> users were migrated over successfully.  The problem is that whenever a
user
> opens Outlook 2000, they are prompted for a username/password/domainname.
> Does anyone know how to correct this?
> please email if possible to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or post replies here.
> thanks!
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received
> it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose
> the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of
> this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the
> BBC, unless specifically stated.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to