oh, thought you meant the 'raid 50' that is what I meant by "1 Raid 0+1 for database " that is, 4 disks, or a disk stripe, mirrored to the other disk stripe.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Ahem, Server Configuration question for swap > > > No, you don't create 3 R0. You create 2 R0 and mirror two R0 to make > R1. > > Brian > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Black, Nathan > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Ahem, Server Configuration question for swap > > > you mean to stripe the raids? (3 raid 0's in a raid 5?) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:13 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Ahem, Server Configuration question for swap > > > > > > I'd not create R1 just for paging. I'd use those two > drives to add to > > > your R 0+1 to give more spindles for your database. > > > > Brian > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Black, Nathan > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:52 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Ahem, Server Configuration question for swap > > > > > > Wise aged Exchange Pros: > > Does putting the swap file on it's own spindle, gain much in > > performance? Or is it better to just split the system > mirror and put > > the swap on the second half? > > > > Proposed configuration is: > > 1. Mirror for system > > 1 Mirror for swap > > 1 Mirror for logs > > 1 Raid 0+1 for database > > > > Total = 10 drives in this config > > The Chassis holds 9 drives, so one option is to split the > > system mirror > > for the swap partition or add an expansion chassis and move > > the database > > to make room for the hot spare and keep the swap on its own > spindles. > > > > Performance isn't an issue, these boxes have MIPS to spare, > > but have any > > of > > you noticed a gain in performance by separating the swap? > Any of you > > made > > this decision, and why? > > > > tia > > Nathan > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
