Oooh, you just might be this time, my friend.  I had to do this for a
boneheaded manager and the 0K limit worked fine, as long as we're still
talking 5.5 here.  The only thing they didn't like about it was that the
system admin messages came in every night.  I had to have them setup a rule
to keep those from annoying them, and then after all that fuss they finally
just took e-mail away from the staff altogether.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restricting recipients


So, there's a technet article which says to set it to 0k too, but I thought
0k == no limit and that 1k was the smallest limit one could set. I'd hate to
be mistaken.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:53 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restricting recipients
> 
> 
> Well sheesh...if that's all you want, go into the properties 
> of the mailbox and click on the limits tab.  In the IS 
> Storage Limits section, uncheck the "Use IS defaults" box, 
> check the prohibit send and the the value to 0.
> 
> Won't that work just as easily?
> 
> Jim Blunt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:43 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restricting recipients
> 
> 
> It's an executive thing.  They need to be assured that emails 
> going to their confidential mailboxes cannot be forwarded to 
> others.  This would create a security breach of sensitive 
> info.  "who is watching the watchers" deal.
> 
> Restricting everyone from those boxes would be a large pain 
> in the ass. I have over 1300 recipients within the org.  I 
> could do a mass dump and edit, but then they will change 
> their minds on a "case by case" basis and I will have a mess. 
>  Any other ideas that are less work?
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to