> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 
> Regarding #2, your argument is valid for Exchange 5.5, but
> with Exchange 2000 and multiple databases your time to
> recovery shouldn't be a function of the number of mailboxes
> on the server but the number in a database.

True, the discussion should be (mostly) based on number of stores rather
than number of servers for Exchange 2000.

> I make a pretty good rebuttal in five minutes, seeing as
> it took you a week to come up with yours, no?!

Um, ok.  Congratulations.  I didn't realize it was a contest.
I usually only have time to scan the list mail every week or so.

Peter

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to