I'm lurking. Same questions different year. My spellchecker didn't change it, I did. I was actually being cordial.
Ed is more my type. He's got the geek look goin' on. Yum. -----Original Message----- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet a. Your spell-chunker changed "onus" to "bonus". b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did. I'm handsomer, though. Well, taller. c. Good to see you're still with us. -tom > -----Original Message----- > From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet > Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet > > > Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause > mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: > > <Tom Meunier> > "I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live > address. Please put me on your "A" list for resale to other > spammers." > > "I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. > Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to > the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location > of my residence. Help yourself." > > "Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting > someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus > is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email > to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our > competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii > answering machine message like this." </Tom Meunier> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OOF replies to the Internet > > > Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in > reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears > some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. > How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send > one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? > > Also, I'm assuming that the "auto-reply to the Internet > issue" remains the > same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? > > Thanks! > > Rob Sargent > > ______________________________ _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
