I'd tend to agree with Andy. With more databases per server, overall SIS decreases on average and the STM has driven up disk space requirements substantially as well. Not that SIS isn't a good thing, but I don't think it factors into Exchange design as much as it used to.. at least for me.
------------------------------------------------------------ Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne ------------------------------------------------------------ > -----Original Message----- > From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: BLB's > > > Where do you get this idea? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:19 AM > Posted To: Microsoft Exchange > Conversation: BLB's > Subject: RE: BLB's > > > > And FWIW, SIS looks like it is becoming less and less > important in the Exchange world anyway. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
