Ed,
Thank you. I'm just trying to get feedback and learn. Sorry to get you so
upset.
I believe that you can go from an active/active configuration to an
active/passive. So I don't see any harm in trying an active/active configuration for
now. It might work for our environment.
Also, I am going to configure a Front-end server.
I respect your opinions on this list.
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
-----Original Message-----
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Concurrent Users
Where did you read that from? Definitely not my post.
CONCURRENT=AT THE SAME TIME
HTTP/POP3/IMAP = not a standard user. Very different profile, especially
without a Front End Server.
I'd definitely have to recommend that you find yourself another set of
"experts" to help you. You are asking questions here that they should
have answered for you, but then you are taking their advice on how to
build your infrastructure. And to have not included a solution for the
POP3/HTTP/IAMP4 users is very questionable.....
And by the way, I believe that I can guarantee you that Compaq and
Microsoft would not recommend the solution that you are saying that they
are. Certain consultants might, but not as a general corporate
recommendation. It was one of the Compaq leads that actually tended to
break the story on Active/Active.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:43 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Concurrent Users
Subject: RE: Concurrent Users
So concurrent users are any user that connects to your exchange servers.
This is a one to one ratio - not dependant upon the protocol they are
using to attach to the server.
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
-----Original Message-----
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Concurrent Users
You have HTTP/POP3/IMAP4 users?
That's a horse of a different color, where are the Front End Servers????
-----Original Message-----
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:22 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Concurrent Users
Subject: Concurrent Users
What does the term "concurrent users" mean?
Does this mean a HTTP/POP3/IMAP4 user is consider the same as an MAPI
user - Load wise?
Can someone please explain what Microsoft means by concurrent users?
Thanks,
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
